Those who are very close to me know very well that I'm a person who adheres to very conservative political values. I believe in personal responsibility. I believe in smaller government that runs on a realistic budget. I believe in a strong national defense to deter our nation's enemies. I believe that unborn children have rights. I believe that it is better to teach a person than to give to a person. Those are just a few of my very strong core beliefs that guide my view on politics.
It should not come as a surprise to anyone who knows me that I support the John McCain - Sarah Palin ticket for President of the United States. I don't support Obama - Biden chiefly because I don't agree with them on any major issue. But I'm also moved by what I see as Senator Obama's blind ambition that has brought him to where he is today.
Senator Obama has indeed engineered an impressive ascent through American politics. From the streets of Chicago as a community organizer, to the State Senate of Illinois to the U.S. Senate. And now who knows? He may just be the next President of the United States. Senator Obama's ascent is an example of how the American dream is truly alive and well.
But now I dare to ask a question. Does the path to the American dream matter when evaluating a person's readiness for the highest office in the land. Should we only acknowledge the titles, Community Organizer, State Senator, U.S. Senator? Do we dare ask what good a person actually accomplished? Do we dare evaluate the ethics and beliefs of the individuals that helped Senator Obama get where his today? I think we should.
For what does it profit a man to gain the whole world, and forfeit his soul?
- Mark 8:36
During his ascent through the ranks of Chicago politics Barack Obama associated himself with a roster of questionable individuals and organizations. These associations enabled Mr. Obama to more easily make the ascent he has made. These associations represent the establishment in Chicago politics. I profile these associations one-by-one below.
The Reverend Jeremiah Wright
Over twenty years ago Barack Obama joined the church of Reverend Jeremiah Wright in south Chicago. At the time Mr. Obama was an outsider looking for a way in to the community. Rev. Wright's church was the "in" that Mr. Obama needed and he embraced the church an Rev. Wright for many years. But the message of Rev. Wright is not one of unity and peace. It is a message of division and anger, promulgating racial stereotypes and feeding hatred based on an anti-American point of view. Why else would a man of the cloth, speaking from the pulpit utter the words, "God damn America." What kind of a man brings people together by pointing out from the pulpit, when young children are in the audience, that America is the "US of KKK A."
Mr. Obama strongly defended Reverend Wright earlier this year, but the following video report from ABC News appears to reveal the true nature of the teachings of the Reverend Jeremiah Wright.
The video does not lie. Reverend Jeremiah Wright frequently preached hate and division from his pulpit. And all along Barack Obama was there. Reverend Wright performed his marriage. Reverend Wright baptized his children. And now Senator Obama claims he never heard anything like what is seen in this video. How is that possible? I don't think it is. How is it possible that Senator Obama who paints himself as a post-partisan uniter could listen to the ravings of Jeremiah Wright and think those teachings were worth absorbing?
The are two answers that make sense to anyone. One is that Senator Obama believes that we live in the United States of KKK. And he believes that with 9/11 our chickens came home to roost. Or maybe Senator Obama doesn't believe it but associated himself with Jeremiah Wright because it was convenient and beneficial for him to do so. Because it must be very hard for a Hawaiian-raised, Ivy League educated person to insinuate themselves into the lives of the people in a city he knew nothing about.
So I believe that Mr. Obama embraced the marriage of convenience in order to gain acceptance in a community where he was a stranger. But in doing so Mr. Obama sold out his principles to a man whose highest principles are sowing the seeds of division and hatred in order to cement his own power.
Senator Obama finally distanced himself from Jeremiah Wright after Rev. Wright continued to make divisive comments at a National Press Club appearance. The Senator is way beyond the streets of Chicago so he doesn't need the Reverend's support any more. It is worth noting that Rev. Wright recently retired to a million dollar mansion and even found himself a new lady friend. Things seems to be going well for both Senator Obama and Rev. Wright. I guess all's well that ends well.
ACORN
Barack Obama has a longstanding relationship with the activist group known as ACORN. The name ACORN (it stands for Association of Community Organizers for Reform Now) sounds harmless enough. But their track record is questionable at best. It's pretty easy to understand why Senator Obama has a past with ACORN. The Senator is famously known as a community organizer. And while no one questions the work that Senator Obama did for ACORN I wonder why Senator Obama would ever align himself with a group whose tactics are so questionable.
ACORN's primary functions involved voter registration and local activism. ACORN's local activism has long included the practice of pressuring banks to make loans to those who could not afford them. A New York Times report titled Fading Red Line details the efforts of ACORN, aided by the Bill Clinton Justice Department, to force banks to make loans to low-income borrowers. A quote from that report follows with emphasis added by myself.
In blighted North Philadelphia, where gutted homes intersect with broken dreams, the banking industry is meeting the inner city.
Prodded by Federal laws and an aggressive community-action group called Acorn, banks here and in other cities across the country have started making mortgage loans in neighborhoods they have traditionally avoided.
In Philadelphia, bankers are setting the rules for this kind of lending. So far, $60 million has been lent in a widely watched program. It matters little if an applicant has a small income, an irregular job pattern or collects welfare or food stamps. He or she might still qualify for a mortgage, bankers here say -- a radical departure from tradition banking practices.
There is no doubt that ACORN, and other groups like them, played a very prominent role in creating the current financial crisis. Banks made loans and did business that they would not otherwise engage in because they feared being tagged as discriminatory. The actions of ACORN amount to cultural extortion. We see now, that the long term results of the efforts of ACORN have lead to financial devastation for much of America.
Barack Obama has recently made attempts to distance himself from ACORN. But if Senator Obama wasn't practicing the ACORN doctrine then what was he doing as a community organizer? What agenda did Obama adhere to that was different from the ACORN agenda?
Whether or not Senator Obama ever worked directly for ACORN is a point of contention. But no one disputes that Senator Obama sympathizes with the group and supports their causes. Stanley Kurtz of National Review says that, "...a bit of digging into Obama's years in the Illinois State Senate indicates strong concern with Acorn's signature issues, as well as meetings with Acorn and the introduction by Obama of Acorn-friendly legislation on the living wage and banking practices. The Cleveland Leader also recently published an article about Obama and ACORN that provides more details on the relationship and states that, "Attempts to hide evidence of Obama's involvement with ACORN have included wiping the web clean of potentially damaging articles that had appeared, and were previously publicly accessible."
What makes this association very important is the fact that ACORN is a very powerful group in Chicago politics. But they are also very powerful nationally and have pushed ideas and utilized tactics that have been damaging to the United States on many levels. Senator Obama never questioned these ideas or tactics, even as members of the group have been arrested and convicted across the country.
Today the strong ties between Senator Obama and ACORN continue. His campaign made an $800,000 payment to an ACORN subsidiary earlier this year. The Pittsburgh Tribune-Review reports that, "An Obama spokesman said Federal Election Commission reports would be amended to show Citizens Services Inc. -- a subsidiary of ACORN -- worked in "get-out-the-vote" projects, instead of activities such as polling, advance work and staging major events as stated in FEC finance reports filed during the primary."
Just this week we have the news that ACORN helped one person register to vote 72 times. the FBI has raided ACORN's Las Vegas offices to investigate a number of alleged offenses including, "...submitting fraudulent voter-registration forms -- including for the starting lineup of the Dallas Cowboys."
Senator Obama's longtime association with ACORN raises serious questions about his judgement. Does he condone pumping up the voter registration rolls with fake documentation? Does he condone people voting multiple times? Does Senator Obama condone the extortion of business from banks under the threat of public shame? Does Senator Obama think that loans should be made to people who can't afford to pay the money back?"
I don't know the answers to the previous questions for sure. But I do know that if nothing else, an association with ACORN meant stronger political support from the power brokers in Chicago politics, as ACORN's causes are championed by those who feed at the federal and State troughs of taxpayer dollars. Two of those power brokers are a convicted felon named Tony Rezko and a domestic terrorist named Bill Ayers.
In Part II of this series I will explore Senator Obama's deep and troubling connections to both Tony Rezko and Bill Ayers.

Leave a comment