Recently in Politics Category
This is part II in a series of two posts that detail some of the more troubling associations of Presidential candidate Barack Obama. In my previous post I highlighted his relationships with the Reverend Jeremiah Wright and the activist group known as ACORN.
Interestingly enough, in the day since I published the first post, news has broken that ACORN voter fraud may have occurred in yet another state. In what I hope is an isolated incident, a 7 year old girl has shown up on the voter registration rolls in Connecticut. The form that registered the girl to vote was fraudulently submitted by ACORN workers.
It is very clear that Senator Obama cultivated his associations with Wright and ACORN in order to gain acceptance and trust in the local community in Chicago. Entry into Chicago politics required further assistance and more money. Senator Obama was able to find the assistance he needed, financial and otherwise, via friendships with Tony Rezko and Bill Ayers.
Tony Rezko
Tony Rezko is a very powerful man in the world of Chicago politics with the ability to raise hundreds of thousands of dollars for political campaigns. Tony Rezko has been a longtime friend and associate of Barack Obama. In a story published today by the Associated Press the link between Obama and Rezko is confirmed.
"Rezko also was friendly with Obama -- offering him a job when he finished law school, funding his earliest political campaigns and purchasing a lot next to his house."
Mr. Rezko did a little more than just purchase the lot next to Senator Obama's house. When Senator Obama purchased his million dollar mansion in the Hyde Park section of Chicago, the sale price was for $300,000 less than the asking price. The lot next door was purchased by Tony Rezko's wife at full asking price. Later on Senator Obama purchased a parcel of the lot next door back from Mrs. Rezko in order to expand his own yard. Call the situation what you like, but the whole deal looks like a favor. This favor occurred while Mr. Rezko was under investigation for the crimes he would eventually be convicted for.
Tony Rezko is now a convicted felon. He was convicted in June 2008 of fraud in attempting to get millions of dollars in kickbacks on state funded real estate deals. Tony Rezko is also a slumlord. And Barack Obama was connected to some of the housing deals whose costs were forced onto the backs of taxpayers when Mr. Rezko stopped making payments on the projects.
An investigation by the Chicago Sun-Times titled, "Obama and His Rezko Ties" makes the connection between Obama and Rezko's real estate deals.
"Obama was an attorney with a small Chicago law firm -- Davis Miner Barnhill & Galland -- that helped Rezmar get more than $43 million in government funding to rehab 15 of their 30 apartment buildings for the poor."
"While I was a state senator, he had buildings in my district that apparently were not managed properly. I had no knowledge of that at the time.''
For what does it profit a man to gain the whole world, and forfeit his soul?
- Mark 8:36
- Redacted - $65,000
- Stop Loss - $10.9 million
- Lions For Lambs - $15 million
- In The Valley of Elah - $6 million
“I have a really interesting political point of view, and it’s not always something I say too loud at dinner tables here, but you can’t go from a $2,000-a-night suite at La Mirage to a penitentiary and really understand it and come out a liberal. You can’t. I wouldn’t wish that experience on anyone else, but it was very, very, very educational for me and has informed my proclivities and politics ever since.”
See here.
The buzz from many media pundits after Governor Sarah Palin's successful speech last night was that she didn't right her speech. So the inference is that although the speech was excellent, the ideas and accomplishments weren't really Gov. Palin's because a speechwriter was involved. Could the members of the press who have advocated this position be more silly?
I guess it may be news to the many politicos who cover these campaigns that all Presidential campaigns employ speechwriters. Senator Obama's campaign employs three speechwriters as detailed in a January 20, 2008 article in the New York Times titled What Would Obama Say?
Mr. Favreau, or Favs, as everyone calls him, looks every bit his age, with a baby face and closely shorn stubble. And he leads a team of two other young speechwriters: 26-year-old Adam Frankel, who worked with John F. Kennedy’s adviser and speechwriter Theodore C. Sorensen on his memoirs, and Ben Rhodes, who, at 30, calls himself the “elder statesman” of the group and who helped write the Iraq Study Group report as an assistant to Lee H. Hamilton.
I just had to make this comparison between Alaska and Delaware with respect to the revenue supplied to the U.S. government from the energy industry. Because after all, Alaska is a "tiny" state.
In 2007 Federal Royalty Revenue from the State of Alaska totaled $68,310,417. In 2007 Federal Royalty Revenue from the State of Delaware totaled $0. The State of Illinois supplied $248,808 to the Federal Government.
I'm Better Off
I'm better off now than I was eight years ago. That assessment seems to be a popular measure of success for a particular party or President. I don't think that success in a person's life is necessarily directly attributable to decisions made by politicians. I've lived in a country with a Republican President, in states run largely by Democratic politicians. And for the last two years Congress has been controlled by Democrats. My life is affected in part by decisions made by members of both parties. But the decisions that have the greatest impact on my life are made by me.
The fact is that I have architected my life in such a way that I
have minimal reliance on the government. I don't want or need the
government to provide me health care, education or any other social
assistance in my day-to-day life. I don't expect the government to save
money so my children can go to college. I included health care costs in
a monthly budget. I save money each month in education funds for both
of my children and have done so since they were only a few months old.
I look to the government to preserve and protect but not to provide.
Looking back on the last eight years I see that things today could have been a heck of a lot worse. After 9/11/2001 there was a lot of uncertainty. What would the U.S. do? How would we move forward? Could we move forward? Well we did move forward. The U.S. invaded Afghanistan and destroyed the Al Qaeda training camps. They should have been destroyed years earlier. Then the U.S. invaded Iraq and eliminated Saddam Hussein. This should have been taken care of during the first invasion of Iraq.
The Iraq War
War is a terrible thing. But so is a failure to recognize who your sworn enemies are. During the 1990s the U.S. failed to recognize the major threat that Al Qaeda and the extreme fringes of Islam posed to the country. To quote Barack Obama's pastor and spiritual advisor Jeremiah Wright, "America's chickens have come home to roost." Indeed but not because anything we had done, but because of what we failed to do.
In many ways I feel that President Bush and his fellow leaders failed the country in their conduct of the war in Iraq. It seemed to me that the war was fought to appease the media and make us seem like a more compassionate country. Unfortunately the enemy is not compassionate and they took advantage of that fact to humiliate us and cause great harm to the decent people of Iraq. Mistakes are made in war and I also have to give credit to the people who were the architects of what has been a great turnaround via the strategy known as "the surge."
I want the war in Iraq to be over. But I want it to be over via victory, not retreat. The surge has allowed a path out of Iraq that is compassionate, honorable and makes sense. You win wars by fighting, not sitting still. And now that our troops have been allowed to fight they are closer to completing the mission than ever before. So I remember that when many Democratic leaders thought (and said) the war was lost that John McCain fought for a change in strategy.
The Housing Crisis
There are bubbles that occur in just about every decade in the modern era. The current situation with housing and mortgages is no different. Many people gambled on the run up in housing prices and many people lost. President Clinton had a bubble of his own with tech stocks in the late 1990s. The bubble burst in March of 2000. A lot of people lost a lot of money in that time. There was very little sympathy for the plight of these investors because the perception is that people who invest in stocks are all rich.The reality is that new technology had opened the world of investing to the little guy and gal. And loads of personal wealth and retirement was tied up in stocks via mutual funds. There was plenty of pain to go around. Whose fault was it? I don't think it was President Clinton's fault. And I don't think that the housing bubble bursting is President Bush's fault. Individuals made decisions and some of those decisions were poor ones. I don't think that the purpose of the government is to guarantee success or prevent failure. We have now and should continue to have a free market for real estate in this country.
The end result of the housing bubble has had effects that are positive for some people and negative for others. The drop in housing prices has made a home truly affordable again to many people who had been priced out during the bubble years. Count me in to that category. I bought a house this summer that was unaffordable to me and my family at peak bubble prices. For some the effects have been very negative.
Many people bought homes with no money down on adjustable teaser rates and are now paying a higher price for their home due to higher interest rates.Others bought second and third homes as investments. Some took out equity lines in order to "tap into the equity" built up in their homes. Everyone who accepted these deals also took on a great deal of risk. Sometimes risk is rewarded and other times risk leads to negative consequences.
If you think that the government can (or should) protect you from market bubbles then you are in for a big surprise.You are the only one who can do that. Think before you take on a large amount of debt. Don't count and spend money that isn't in your hands. And don't believe it when people tell you that prices will always keep going up.
The Cost of Energy
Energy prices have increased greatly in the last few years. The price of gas is way up. The price of heating oil and natural gas are way up.This effects every American in a multitude of ways. Our standard of living and ability to compete economically are greatly reduced because everything is effected by the cost of energy. I felt the pinch personally when I was driving 55 miles each way to work for a year. Between gas and tolls I was spending almost $300 per month on commuting costs. We were also living in a rented house whose monthly oil bills were approaching $500 per month.
Even though these added costs spelled trouble for the budget I took action before and after prices skyrocketed to mitigate the issue. Knowing that we would be living in an out of the way area I purchased the most fuel efficient car that would meet my needs for a second car. My Honda Civic gets nearly 40 MPG on the highway. And when the heating oil bill got ridiculous I decided that we absolutely needed to move closer to my work and live in a house with natural gas heat. We've done that and our budget has several hundred dollars a month more to show for it.
I think that the government does need to take action in order to create better energy security for the country. I hope that the next President embraces the utilization of domestic oil and gas production as much as possible. But until that time I'm doing everything I can, including adjusting my lifestyle and reworking my budget, to make sure that the effects of rising energy cost don't torpedo my family's economic future.
I Have Hope
Barack Obama is selling "hope" and "change" as the reasons to vote for him for President. But I have hope no matter who is elected to Presidential office. And I know that I can effect change in my life if I work hard enough. That's why I decided to enroll in a part-time MBA program at night. I'm not waiting for the government to hand me a better future. I'm continuing my education and making an investment in myself that I think will pay off for my family.
The Next Eight Years
In the last eight years my salary has increased about 30%. I got married. My wife and I have two children. We have a great house that really suits us. I'm employed doing something that I am passionate about. This is the life that I have planned and this is the life that I am living. I counted on the government for none of it. And that's why I plan on being better off eight years from now no matter who gets elected President.
