By Vincent Safuto staff writer
October 18, 2003
Last year, I wrote a column that criticized President Bush's call for Americans to donate two years of their lives to volunteer work. ("Volunteer suggestion impractical," March 12, 2002).
Not surprisingly, I was toasted to a very well-done crisp for daring to suggest that people should expect payment for their labors, and that some people in our country have bills to pay, so working for nothing is not very practical.
In a recent article, Rep. Mark Foley took on AmeriCorps, the volunteer program originated by Bill Clinton and supported by Bush. Indeed, the president has asked Congress to fund 25,000 more members above the 50,000 slots it is supposed to have, and I salute him for that.
But the president has run into opposition on Capitol Hill from his own party, including Foley, a Republican from West Palm Beach
The reason, Foley noted in the article in the Oct. 7 Press Journal, is that AmeriCorps pays the people who do the work in the community.
"'The notion of having to pay people to volunteer in America kind of smacks against the tenets of how this nation was founded,'" Foley said. "'Volunteerism is not for a personal financial reward. It's for a spirit of helping your community.'"
That's all well and good, congressman, but not all of us are pulling down $154,000, plus benefits, to sit around and jabber about the wonders of other people working for nothing. Members of Congress and corporate CEOs love to brag about how they're not in it for the money. They say they're serving the public or the customers or the shareholders but how many of them are handing back their paychecks?
Even those who proclaim they are working for free have independent means of wealth and, thus, have the luxury of claiming the moral high ground over those of us who work for pay. I don't see Foley giving his paycheck back.
No one's getting rich working for AmeriCorps. "Full-time members who complete a year of service get a $4,725 education grant," Joel Eskovitz noted in his article.
They're using that money because corporate America, which causes many of the problems AmeriCorps volunteers are trying to solve, is too busy gorging its executives with obscene pay packages, exporting jobs overseas and doling out campaign contributions to the likes of Foley to even concern itself with those who are less fortunate.
To the average member of Congress, $4,725 may be one night's work on the handshake line at a fund-raiser or an afternoon's work on a paragraph to be inserted into a bill for a "good friend," but to a struggling student it may mean the difference between getting an education and having to skip another semester.
Most of us live in the real world, not in the fabulous land of Beltway make-believe, and have to work for a living. If Foley has a problem with that, maybe it's time for him to come down off his high horse, join the peasants and stop tearing down efforts to make life better for the American people.
Vincent F. Safuto is a copy editor for the Press Journal. Reach him at ( Vincent.Safuto@scripps.com).
--------
